The world is aghast over the assasination of the one of the founders of the military wing of Hamas, Mahmoud al-Mabhouh. Hamas is a fanatical Islamic terrorist organisation and I for one will shed no tears over the death of a man responsible for slaughtering innocents.
Gordon Brown, the man whose governemnt specialise in appeasing terrorists is apalled and demands an enquiry into how five faked British Passports were used by the assasins?
The passports were most likely supplied by The Home Office, or rather, by the criminally negligent incompetents in charge.
18, May 2006. The Home Office admits: 1,500 UK passports that should have been returned to their owners have gone missing.
30th July 2008 The Home Office admits: Hijackers stole thousands of British passports and visas while the delivery driver was buying chocolate.
12th November 2008
Home office admits five losing five passports a day. Figures uncovered by the Liberal Democrats reveal that between 2001 and 2007, government officials lost 12,200 passports in the post.
Since February 2004, when the Identity and Passport Service - a Home Office agency - ditched Royal Mail and awarded a multi-million-pound contract to a courier service to deliver the documents, 3,000 have gone missing.
Perhaps it is us who should be demanding and explanation as to how British Passports are so readily availbale for misuse, from Gordon Brown?
Much breast beating has been done over the torturing of 'British' Guantanamo Bay detainee Binyam Mohamed at the behest of the authorities. But let us get a few things
straight, Binyam Mohamed is an Ethiopian, and is not and never has been a British Citizen.
Binyan Mohamed freely admitted
that he left the United Kingdom
in 2001 and travelled to Pakistan to train at the al Farouq terrorist training
camp in Afghanistan.
He admitted receiving 40 days
of training in light arms handling, explosives, and principles of topography.
He admitted being taught to
falsify documents, and received instruction from a senior al Qaeda operative on
how to encode telephone numbers before passing them to another individual.
Mohamed is, by his own admission, an al Qaeda-trained terrorist.
It seems odd that Britain has become a nation of breast beaters over the ill treatment of an Ethtiopian, al Qaeda trained terrorist; when so many of our troops are returning home, either crippled or in flag draped coffins.
Bringing Binyan Mohamed back to to hang would have been acceptable. Because, if he’s British as is claimed, he is also a traitor who aided and abetted an enemy, in time of war.
And before someone cries, “Foul!” and points out that the torturing of prisoners is
against international law, something no civilised person would condone; I tell you now, such arguments are pure liberal hogwash; plattitudes for the masses.
War is not a game of cricket, and in war the rules of engagement must be agreed and
adhered to by both of the opposing sides. Otherwise, terrorists who reject the ‘civilised
rules of combat’, which always favours the side with the most powerful weapons,
will always have the advantage of not being restricted by ethics or moral
considerations.
You must fight fire with fire, not with words or concessions. An army bound by regulations that restrict its ability to fight as ruthlessly as its enemy, also lacks the will to win the war, and as history shows it will surely lose the final battle.
For myself I do not give a damn if terrorists are tortured in order to save the
lives of our troops. It makes perfect sense to me.
The follwing letter was written by a housewife, in New
Brunswick, to her local newspaper.
'Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we?
Was it or was it not started by Islamic people who brought it to our shores on September 11, 2001 and have
continually threatened to do so since?
Were people from all over the world, not brutally murdered that day, in downtown Manhattan, across the Potomac from the capitol of the USA and in a field in Pennsylvania?
Did nearly three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning or crushing death that day, or didn't they?
And I'm supposed to care that a
few Taliban were claiming to be tortured by a justice system of the nation they
come from and are fighting against in a brutal insurgency.
I'll start caring when Osama bin Laden turns himself in and repents for incinerating all those innocent people on 9/11.
I'll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East start caring
about the Holy Bible , the mere belief of which is a crime punishable by
beheading in Afghanistan . . .
I'll care when these thugs tell the world they are sorry for hacking off Nick
Berg's head while Berg screamed through his gurgling slashed throat.
I'll care when the cowardly so-called 'insurgents' in Afghanistan come out and fight like men instead of disrespecting their own religion by hiding in mosques and behind
women and children.
I'll care when the mindless zealots who blow themselves up in search of nirvana
care about the innocent children within range of their suicide bombs.
I'll care when the Canadian media stops pretending that their freedom of speech
on stories is more important than the lives of the soldiers on the ground or
their families waiting at home to hear about them when something happens.
In the meantime, when I hear a story about a CANADIAN soldier roughing up an
Insurgent terrorist to obtain information, know this: I don't care.
When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to move
because he might be booby-trapped, you can take it to the bank: I don't care.
When I hear that a prisoner, who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and fed
'special' food that is paid for by my tax dollars, is complaining that his holy
book is being 'mishandled,' you can absolutely believe in your heart of hearts:
I don't care.
And oh, by the way, I've noticed that sometimes it's spelled 'Koran' and other
times ' Quran .' Well, Jimmy Crack Corn you guessed it: I don't care!!
